Loic Minier writes... > > * #328418 - dependency problems with the version in unstable > > This is fixed, and has nothing to do with the problem.
Great. > > * Gnome 2.10 transition > > This is mostly over, we're preparing the GNOME 2.12 transition now, but > there are a lot of things to prepare. Good. Someone was also asking me why Debian was still transitioning to 2.10 when 2.12 was out. I didn't know since I don't track that stuff. > > Are these still issues? What else? [snip] > > I think jordim is currently trying to sort things out regarding the > state of gal in NEW. Great. > > I'm sick of hearing my co-workers complain about this... > > Why don't you build it yourself? Build the source in experimental myself? or package my own version? Anyway the reason I don't is that I don't use evolution :P But several people I work with do and have been saying things like "I'm giving up on Debian and switching to ubuntu". When I ask why, they cite evolution being broken and out of date in Debian unstable/experimental and available in other distros. Now of course I gave them the lectures about "it's called 'unstable' for a reason" and "experimental is just a developer playground" , but still, they have a point. Anyway that's beside the point, the purpose of this bug is not to find a way to get it working on my machine, it's to find a way to get it in unstable so people can install it without extra effort, even if it is buggy . And it's "wishlist". > Why are you tracking unstable at your > office? Those in question track unstable because they want the latest version, even if it means some bugs. In particular they want some of the newer calendar kinds of features I think. Oh and I work at HP's Open Source and Linux R&D Lab and we're a Debian shop who need to run unstable :) Thanks for the info, -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]