-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Moin,
Am Mo den 19. Aug 2013 um 11:52 schrieb Guillem Jover: > I see the problem and I agree that something should be done about it, > but as I mentioned in [0], Where is that [0]? > I don't think the right place to plug a global distribution > environment policy is s-s-d, because using it is not required by the > debian-policy and as such some daemons might not be using it to start. It might not be but it could be a good place for it. > <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631081#58> Is this the [0]? > Adding support for some kind of controls on the process environment to > s-s-d might make sense, but not in the way you present here. Well, it is just a first Idea to get around such bugs. I have no solutions at the moment. For my company I created a job scheduler in perl that is cleaning up the environment and taking full control over it. This might be no good idea for s-s-d, but somewhat in between ... Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <[email protected]> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJSEftCAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasQvAL/3n3kA753soCXGSlMn8V4ZGb zQrqVbt1VCrEyQVE04pi5t6Q/0ZsWRzOSgdkKhwJCN/pz3wBzNXEk4EZ/OYN9X2t 0FuJmsE4jpjlpKywO+A6jL5CBOUKISvi3anlDQayjVtP2Ltn3SMpGQ8REPT94S3/ uuJCb0EAIk2J3CcWasLVjO65OH1OjMeHWhJxEon23vuO6/sovL4tXccgeujuDhxe HHT5Sg3+jm1zM7bKxyoENRsHPVjKLkVzvR4hXUgLzQVZnejjuG0Wh8u5yZCUkgkV e3NMQzmGwt8vTrh9zkigNnuC+9OXVk8qk22RrHyFtmUhUiggqOax07neCe+S6lXM nc4evMu05PSCt31w3X1Fmq9fQap3E1mcRSV8mFLVkzg9r7Ctrip/KEtLfrAq9wlq 6nd2RQZ7t1TCHXNnJpkovIlPkGROXBHJCR+zAEmcqGq5RCT7k1WCodN5tC9/TDf0 +EU5P3S1ScIaxRYnz9JeBBXM0BhyQc9fz+6t8YmcoQ== =oxzx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
