On 2013-08-15 20:18, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > ¡Hola Niels! > > El 2013-08-15 a las 16:28 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: >>> After the binutils 2.23.52.20130612-1 entered the archive lots of C++ >>> programs >>> that don't explicitly use the libc produce: >>> E: library-not-linked-against-libc >>> messages. This issue was first reported to binutils in #712081, but the >>> upstream developers claim its working as intended (when only weak symbols >>> are >>> used there is no strict dependency). > >> Do you have a reference to upstream's claim for reference? > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > The actual quote is: > """ > I think it is quite reasonable. After all, linking without the > library in question will succeed, and that will leave undefined weak > symbols undecorated. > """ > Available in: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-07/msg00001.html > > Which is referenced in the closing message in #712081. > > Happy hacking, >
Mmm, can we presume that these libraries will instead link (directly) against the libstdc++ ? ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
