Hi David, 2013/8/18, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net>: > Andrey Gursky <andrey.gur...@e-mail.ua> writes: > > >> 2.4.6 (July 2013): >> Binary compatiblility with both OpenCL 1.1/1.2 platforms. Now the >> binaries compiled with any of AMD/Intel/Nvidia's SDK can run on all >> other platforms. >> >> Please, consider packaging this module. > > Do you happen to know if this module is usable with a free (as in > [1]) OpenCL platform? Otherwise it might be a bit tricky to distribute > in Debian main. >
I assume, ocl being a part of opencv has the same license. Why should developers decide for users how ocl module can be used. I mean, ocl module itself is as free as whole opencv. If one needs to install some opencl libraries from non-free, why should this impact the right of ocl module to be packaged in main? It would depend only on ocl-icd from main. > To be honest, I don't know if any free OpenCL platform has reached the > usable stage, but I'd certainly be interested to know about one that > had. > Usable stage? There is a fpgatools package with only "hello world" functionality (proof of concept). But that's great it is already in testing! I mean, Debian users should decide whether some package is useful for them or not; it's impossible to do this for all of them. > [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, what do you think? Regards, Andrey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
