On Mi, 04 Sep 2013, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>       if (lig_part[0] != '\0') {
>         GBool namesRecurse = gTrue, ligaturesRecurse = gFalse;
>         if ((m = parseCharName(lig_part, uBuf + n, uLen - n, namesRecurse,
>                                ligaturesRecurse, numeric, hex, variants)))
>           n += m;
>         else
>           error(errSyntaxWarning, -1, "Could not parse ligature component 
> \"{0:s}\" of \"{1:s}\" in "
>                 "parseCharName", lig_part, charName);
>       }

So that means that 
        downmodels_uni0338
cannot be parsed, in particular 
        downmodels

Looking into the parseCharName routine it seems because it cannot find
an unicode name nor that it looks like a proper name.

I would not say that this is an error. THere are many glyphs not recorded
in the unicode standard.

> So, it really is a "PDF syntax error", not a limitation in poppler.

No, I still disagree. It is not a PDF syntax error. iT is a mistreatment
of poppler. Only because it cannot parse a charname does not mean that
it is invalid, I guess.

Norbert

------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to