Package: fonts-ebgaramond Version: 0.015+git20130522-1 Severity: normal Hello and thanks for packaging these fonts! Some suggestions:
(1) Drop the TTFs, most software can handle the OTFs just fine and having both will mean double font listings in some software. (2) Drop or split (to e.g. fonts-ebgaramond-extra) the SC variant fonts. Most typesetters nowaday know how to handle “smart” font features available in the base fonts. Suggestion: drop. (3) Drop or split (to e.g. fonts-ebgaramond-experimental or -extra) the Initial and Bold variant fonts. They are far from complete and will not behave as expected on a production system. They are worth packaging for use of limited scope. Suggestion: split. Thanks in advance, Kess -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
