On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 23:44:12 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Is this the right syntax for the break clause: > > Breaks: jakarta-jmeter (<< 2.8-1), > jenkins-instance-identity (<< 1.3-1), > jglobus (<< 2.0.6-1), > libitext-java (<< 2.1.7-6), > libpdfbox-java (<< 1:1.8.2+dfsg-1), > voms-api-java (<< 2.0.9-1.1) > > I listed only the package that were confirmed to break and required and > modification. I'm not sure about versions, should I use (<< X) where X > is the first version supporting Bouncy Castle >= 1.47, or should I use > (<= Y) where Y is the last version in testing compatible with Bouncy > Castle 1.44?
The former, i.e. "<< X"; it should break everything less than the first fixed version of those packages, since there are broken (pun intended). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Pink Floyd: Run like hell
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
