On 14/09/13 02:23, brian m. carlson wrote: > It would be really nice to know if there's been any progress on > separating the GUI parts of libcairo2 from the non-GUI parts. Today > brought another upgrade on my server that I had to block because I don't > need or want mesa installed on a server just because I have cups > installed.
There has not been any work towards this, and I think it's unlikely to happen given how cairo is currently designed. The only solution I can think of is having two builds, one that builds libcairo2-nox and another one that builds libcairo2-full, then have both packages conflict with each other and provide libcairo2. Then those that need the gl/egl bits can depend on libcairo2-full unconditionally. I'm not sure I like that though, just saying it's the only way I can think of of solving this. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
