I talked with doctormo about it (cc'd) - I think the license change might be retroactive?
Thanks erryboddy! T On Sep 14, 2013 10:07 AM, "Alex Valavanis" <valavanisa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is fixed upstream... all CC 2.0/2.5 licenses have been > removed from Inkscape trunk [1]. Can a patch be backported? > > AV > > [1] > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/revision/12514 > > On 13 September 2013 21:11, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:05:20PM +0200, Luca BRUNO wrote: > >> > Perhaps you can clarify this with the Inkscape authors ? Maybe they > >> > intended GPL-2 anyway... > >> > >> I don't think so. The logo was contributed by jimmac and originally > >> under CC. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/345778 > >> > >> > Severity: serious > >> > > >> > that the Inkscape icon contains a statement suggesting that its > >> > license is CC-BY-SA 2.0. This is unfortunate, as Debian's FTP team > >> > does not consider it Free. > >> > >> I'm unsure about this. I remember an old thread on -project where it > >> was found that clause 4b of CC-BY-SA 2.0 allows upgrading to later > >> version, and several packages already fit in that case. > >> I think we are in the same case. > >> > >> Moreover, I can still get in touch with jimmac and ask for a license > >> change, or just apply clause 4b upstream. > > > > 4b only applies to derivitive works. I don't know who made this rumor, > > but it's resulted in a few REJECTs. > > > > Cheers, > > Paul > > > > > > -- > > .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> > > : :' : Proud Debian Developer > > `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 > > `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag >
