btw -- was asking/looking into it because we have few packages (fsl and afni which is not in archive yet) which deliver their binaries somewhere under /usr/lib while also having some .sh scripts under e.g. /etc/fsl/VERSION/fsl.sh which users are supposed to source to get all the binaries into their space... well -- exact use case for the "modules" to get used ;) So I think we (CCing Michael as well) might benefit from just depending on 'environment-modules' and shipping our modulefiles instead of ad-hoc .sh scripts.
-- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org