btw -- was asking/looking into it because we have few packages (fsl and
afni which is not in archive yet) which deliver their binaries somewhere
under /usr/lib while also having some .sh scripts under e.g.
/etc/fsl/VERSION/fsl.sh which users are supposed to source to get all
the binaries into their space... well -- exact use case for the "modules"
to get used ;)   So I think we (CCing Michael as well) might  benefit
from just depending on 'environment-modules' and shipping our
modulefiles instead of ad-hoc .sh scripts.

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to