On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:

> Not everyone uses VoiceTronix hardware; I have been told that the vpb channel
> is still unstable, and would prefer not to install libvpb.

Upstream set the module chan_vpb as disabled by default somewhere
between versions 1.8 and 11. I forgot about it and thus the current
package does not build the module. This should be fixed in the next
upload (which should be soon, the package FTBFS). But I'll use this
excuse to ask the following question:

I wonder if moving it to a subpackage makes more sense now.
* Now that dahdi is on a separate sub-package, libvpb is the only one
  pulling, by recommendation, module-assistant.
* libvpb0 has a high-priority debconf question. Having it with such a
  high priority does not make sense if most of the users installing it
  install it just for Asterisk.

So, a separate subpackagee?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to