On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:16:46AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > forwarded 223280 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3240 > thanks
> > Don't worry about me for this bug; I actually stopped using Samba a year > > or so ago. However, unless somebody else's added a similar feature, my > > patch (or a recode, which may be easier) would probably still be nice in > > Samba. > > So, feel free to forward the patch to the Samba development list, if you > > want, but don't spend too much time dealing with it. > The patch seems barely adaptable to current sources. > However, as I'm no in the position of judging whether such feature is > relevant or not, I reported this to upstream as is. > If I receive comments from upstream, I'll forward them here. FWIW, the reason this patch was never applied/forwarded before was because I'm not convinced it's necessary; it's trivial to preload user entries into the smbpasswd database with disabled passwords if that's what the admin wants, without any requirement to modify pam_smbpass in this manner, and it's arguably less error-prone to do so, at which point pam_smbpass does what's expected without any further modifications. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
