On Wed, 09 Oct 2013, David Prévot wrote: > <20131004101952.horde.iz3pmetfxpajzu67vfrx...@mail.das-netzwerkteam.de> > <20131004133014.gb29...@gwolf.org> <20131005161432.ga35...@gwolf.org> > <5253a79f.6020...@cyconet.org> <20131003134638.GB5227@trismegisto.universo> > > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote: > > I've noticed about the (just baked) backport of owncloud. Thank you very > > much > > for it. > > > > Unfortunately, there are some dependencies missing. You may take a look > > at [0] > > where I can count up to 12 dependant packages not found. > > > > I wonder if there's something that can be done about this. > > > > [0] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/owncloud > > Looks like this point had already been raised on debian-backports@ > (thanks Mike for the pointer). > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2013/10/msg00006.html > > That makes me wonder: are the people taking care of these backports > willing to take care and follow up on backports related bug reports > filled against owncloud (and its build-)dependencies), such as this one? > I believe it would be the best course of action, making the issue public > in a place were people caring about owncloud will find information and > making it easier for the people from the teams to help each other. > If the answer is “no”, on the other hand, should we just close this bug > report and encourage people interested into owncloud backports to file > further bug reports directly into the backports mailing list following > the documentation? I'll remove owncloud from backports now.
Come back if you have something tested, that some wants to support. Alex - backports ftpmaster -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
