On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As I understand it, python{2,3}-coverage are NOT compatible, and therefore
>> they should NOT use alternatives.
>
> Can you please explain why they are incompatible for people who never
> used them (like me)?I think I have figured it out myself: for example, coverage can use versioned paths (like /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/) in generated reports. This is indeed an incompatibility. -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
