Hi, On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> (05/08/2012): > > The list of open questions is at least: > > > > a) Type: GeoDNS - Does it really make sense ?
The best type for the moment, assuming we don't want to modify chose-mirror. > > b) Impact of this change on choose-mirror ? Does it really make > > http.debian.net appear first ? As said by Joeyh, after primary mirrors. > > c) Impact of this change on http.debian.net ? (risk of creating HTTP > > redirection loops ?) As said by Raphael, no risk. > > d) Consensus (within the mirrors team, within -boot) that http.d.n is > > superior to cdn.d.n ? > > e) status of the integration of http.d.n to http.d.o ? > > e) looks like a particularly interesting question to me. IMO e) is important too. However given that cdn.debian.net is already advertised while not official, I see no reason to not including the service officialy supported by mirror team. So let's add it. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
