Hi Markus,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Markus Koschany <a...@gambaru.de> wrote:
> Control: tags 566901 patch
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 17.10.2013 15:07, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> [...]
>> I don't have the time to review the patch right now. I can have a
>> look this week-end, if you want more eyes, but if you feel confident
>> about the current state, I don't mind an upload as-is.
>
> No worries. Tony Mancill has uploaded the bug fixes for #725461 already.
> Now I'm attaching the debdiff with all the changes to split the package
> into libbatik-java and batik.
>
> I can confirm that these rdeps still build fine with those changes:
>
> scilab-full-bin
> umlet
> sweethome3d-furniture-editor
> sweethome3d
> scilab-full-bin
> osmosis (FTBFS because of a another bug)
> libjeuclid-core-java
> libjcharts-java
> libjaxe-java
> libjasperreports3.7-java
> libjasperreports-java
> freeplane
> freemind-plugins-svg
> libfop-java
> libflamingo-java
> ditaa
Good job for checking all that !
> As you said verifying that everything works as intended is time
> consuming. Therefore I have targeted the new revision for experimental.
> I suggest to ask the maintainers/uploaders of these rdeps to confirm
> that their packages still work fine with the new version as soon as it
> enters experimental. Hopefully this will speed things up a little.
That's definitely the way to go. I can review/sponsor this upload
this week-end if you wish.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
