Package: bbswitch-dkms Severity: normal Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation? I'm using an amd64 architecture but want to install bumblebee:i386 * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I tried to install bumblebee:i386 but has required bbswitch-dkms:i386 who need dkms:i386 (which should be virtual) who doesn't exist * What was the outcome of this action? $ sudo aptitude install bbswitch-dkms:i386 The following NEW packages will be installed: bbswitch-dkms:i386{b} 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 12.5 kB of archives. After unpacking 56.3 kB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: bbswitch-dkms:i386 : Depends: dkms:i386 (>= 2.1.0.0) which is a virtual package. The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Keep the following packages at their current version: 1) bbswitch-dkms:i386 [Not Installed] * Notice The web page http://packages.debian.org/fr/sid/i386/bbswitch-dkms announce the package dependence for dkms correctly ?!? -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages bbswitch-dkms depends on: ii dkms 2.2.0.3-1.2 bbswitch-dkms recommends no packages. Versions of packages bbswitch-dkms suggests: pn bumblebee <none> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org