* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [131104 18:21]: > Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clo...@igalia.com> writes: > > > Regarding the development force behind each project, I find the following > > comparison at Ohloh very illustrative > > > https://www.ohloh.net/p/compare?project_0=openrc&project_1=upstart&project_2=systemd > > This isn't really a fair comparison since systemd as a project contains > considerably more subsystems than upstart or OpenRC do.
Actually I think this comparison contains valuable data points. However, one shouldn't think of it as "more code is always better" - in fact, I have often made the experience that too much code in critical systems is a problem by itself. And as you pointed out, it doesn't show the amount of development force correctly. However, it shows two things: one is as you said that systemd contains many more subsystems as the others (whether this is good or not is a different question), the other is that code documentation seems to be not as verbose as for upstart or OpenRC (in spite of the remarks I saw earlier about how much documentation is there). Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
