On 2013-11-26 13:46, Agustin Henze wrote:
> Hi all, I'm glad to announce that I've adopted this package :)

Hi,

Thanks for taking care of this package.  :)

> and I've
> uploaded a new version (2.0.0-1). This version doesn't build newlib-spu
> anymore. It arrived on the archive a few days ago, should I request the 
> removal
> of the old packages for close this bug?

If they have no more rdeps in sid, then yes.

> I just read[0] that "rene" should take over about it. But newlib orig 1.18
> still there :/ and the cruft-report doesn't show results about newlib. I don't
> understand what happens, it's the first time that I have to deal with 
> something
> like this. If someone can point me what is the correct way that I should
> proceed I'll be very grateful.
> 
> [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
> 

I believe filing the bug will be correct in this case. :)

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to