No worries we all have family and or other commitments so I understand. I also noticed the beta release when i got a notification about my upstream fork pull request getting merged into main. This may drop the need for one of the Debian patches. Because this is a simpler python tool and upstream is usually quiet I figure this is good way to get into Debian maintenance. I would still like to work on this. I will put together a beta and ask you again about sponsoring. Thanks for your time. On Dec 23, 2013 12:17 PM, "Jay Berkenbilt" <q...@debian.org> wrote:
> Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Robinson Sathaseevan <robin...@sathas.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Jay, > >> > >> I have an upload of the latest version over at mentors. That's because > >> I don't have permission to commit to the svn repository for debian/* > >> as a new maintainer. > >> See: http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd > >> > >> There's an RFS bug open as well: > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714292 > >> > >> Jakub Wilk from QA team reviewed and gave me feedback on first upload. > >> I've corrected and patched based on his findings and re-uploaded. > >> > >> Would you be interested in reviewing and sponsoring? > >> > >> Robinson > > > > Sure, I'd be glad to do that. It will probably be sometime next week at > > the earliest before I can get to it. I won't be offended if someone > > beats me to it (of course), but I will try to squeeze it in as soon as I > > can. > > Well, I'm really embarrassed that five months have passed since this > discussion. I had checked a while ago to find that s3cmd was not on > mentors.debian.net anymore and that the status of this bug report was > unchanged. Now there's a beta release of 1.5.0 that should be packaged. > Are you still interested? If you're interested in sponsorship, I can > try to be more responsive, or I can adopt the package. Looks like > upstream is pretty quiet. > > -- > Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> >
