Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > I just see a new version of the binutils package coming in unstable > > but no inclusion of this patch. > > > > Does it need more work ? > > It looks pretty reasonable to me. I think it would make sense to > apply this to experimental now and to unstable at the start of the > Debian 8 cycle. > > The patch also adds an unrelated lintian override for some reason (in > debian/binutils-multiarch-dev.overrides and debian/rules), but that > part's easy enough to think about independently and back out if > unwanted.
Matthias, can you please consider this for the next binutils upload? It looks like we are approaching a new release freeze, and according to previous discussion this is a good timeframe to merge it. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. | ~<[ Luca BRUNO ~ (kaeso) ]>~ : :' : | Email: lucab (AT) debian.org ~ Debian Developer `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 0x3BFB9FB3 ~ Free Software supporter `- | HAM-radio callsign: IZ1WGT ~ Networking sorcerer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
