On 12/29/2013 06:05 PM, Sven Joachim wrote: > Breaks wouldn't help here, Replaces is what's needed. Considering that > over 2000 people have the packages from the MATE repositories > installed[1], adding that might be a good idea.
Oh, yes, you're right. I completely forgot about Replaces. >> but mixing different repositories is problematic anyways. > > Indeed, if a newer version gets uploaded to the MATE repositories people > tracking it will likely experience the same problem again. This actually shouldn't happen as the same people who create the MATE Debian packages are also involved with the Debian packages and will perform all further updates to the packages in Debian only, leaving the MATE Debian packages in their old versions. I will talk to Stefano regarding this issue and ask him not to update the packages in MATE's repositories anymore. Thanks for the feedback everyone! Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org