Hi again Andreas, Le vendredi, 3 janvier 2014, 23.53:48 Andreas Barth a écrit : > * Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [140103 23:43]: > > Considering you've had your chance to respond to this (and given > > that you managed to respond in less than a half-hour last time), I > > have uploaded the proposed debdiff to DELAYED/5 as announced. > > Sorry, this is not acceptable.
Your take. >From my side, I don't find acceptable that you block a reasonable patch for a serious bug that triggers the ftp-master autoreject lintian check; proposed since four months without a review (or any sort of statement about the patch) from your side. I find it totally incomprehensible that you block RC fixes for a package you haven't uploaded yourself in six _years_. Furthermore, the continued existence of this bug lead to the automated removal of mgetty, courier, courier-filter-perl, mysqmail, and couriergrey from testing [0,1]. This bug was brought to my attention by the (non-DD) maintainer of couriergrey who was puzzled about his package being taken out of testing. Not being able to timely fix bugs in reverse-dependencies IMHO makes the auto-removal process just more painful for unnecessary reasons. For the record, the patch proposed by gregor to fix this bug has the following stats: mgetty-fax.dirs | 2 -- mgetty-fax.postinst | 3 +-- mgetty-fax.postrm | 1 + 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) I think we both spent way more time arguing than it would have taken you to properly review it and {N,}ACK it (and fix two RC bugs in the process). > Please remove it immediatly. I canceled it yesterday night. > I made a statement as maintainer I do not want this upload at this > time and asked you for a little bit of time to review the change. Fair enough. I initially read your "So please remove your upload until I can review the situation again." differently than I do now; I've probably been too stubborn, sorry for that. > You are not authorized to behave the way you did. As I argued before, my reading of your initial opposition (against variations of rmdir -f) and the NMU guidelines would have initially allowed me a direct upload. Now that you insisted on blocking all uploads, right; sorry for that. > Also, if it is that urgent, why did you not e.g. ping me on IRC? It's been urgent (as in RC) for more than four months, why didn't you review the proposed patch </sarcasm>? Also, on a more serious tone, I generally want to keep track of bug conversations in the public bug logs (in this case, more especially so as you suggested an appeal to the tech-ctte…). Anyway. I'm giving up on this for now, with the hope that mgetty's reverse dependencies will somehow find a way towards testing. With my best regards, OdyX [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing-changes/2013/12/msg00050.html [1] Arguably, courier has its own RC bug.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.