Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:40:54PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'd prefer to leave it in. Upstream's opinions aside, systemd is free >> software and if someone wants to try to port it (or, possibly more >> likely, "port" it by writing something native that provides the same >> interfaces), they can. Maybe upstream is right and it's untenable; >> maybe they're wrong and it's not as hard as they think. I realize it's >> horribly unlikely for jessie, but still, as a matter of principle, I'd >> rather encourage the same software or at least the same interfaces >> across all of our ports. > If it's "horribly unlikely for jessie", then it doesn't seem to me like > something that the TC should be telling porters they "should" do. I thought that was already resolved? I objected to the "should" in the original language regarldess of which init system we choose, and Ian said that he'd reworded it already to something akin to mine, which just says that ports will use the same default init system if it has been ported, otherwise yadda yadda. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
