Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > AFAICT we are all agreed that:
> * Applications which aren't part of the init system must not require a > particular init to be pid 1. (So in particular a desktop > environment may not require a particular pid 1.) I still have concerns about this. This position seems to be predicated on the assumption that applications will be able to depend on a working logind for jessie, and that a working logind will be provided for systems using sysvinit. This apparently works today with systemd-shim but will stop working with post-205 systemd. I want to understand whether setting this requirement means that we're intending to require that jessie ship with systemd 204, or, if not, what level of certainty we have that post-205 logind will work with sysvinit for jessie. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
