On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:18:46PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:07:09 +0100 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 07:33:09PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:52:45 +0100 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > [...] > > > > I will do another "last upload" of ruby1.8 dropping the alternatives > > > > entries ... :-/ > > > > > > Excellent, thanks a lot! > > > > Actually, that's not what I'll do. > > > > We are having a Ruby team sprint in Paris, and together we just figured > > out a way of fixing the problem for both stable and testing/unstable. > > There should be uploads soon. > > Good, I am curious to see which fix you managed to "cook"! ;-) > Could you please describe the chosen strategy? > > Thanks for your time.
we will make the following change: - librubyX.Y.Z depends on rubyX.Y.Z - rubyX.Y.Z depends on ruby - ruby depends on the default ruby - ruby conflicts with all obsolete interpreters so this will force ruby1.8 to be removed on upgrades. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
