Hi Don, On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:41:32PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > Systemd's socket-based activation and cgroup based tracking are > technically superior to upstart, even though the latter causes problems > with portability to non-linux systems. However, if we were to decide on > upstart, we could have just a single init system everywhere, which would > be beneficial.[3]
<snip> > I should point out that I have not extensively examined openrc, nor have > I taken into account planned features and development in either systemd > or upstart which could sway my opinion. As you say that planned features or development could sway your opinion: are there particular features that you have in mind, here? For instance, correcting upstart's socket-based activation interface is on the upstart roadmap in the jessie timeframe. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
