On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Ian Jackson wrote: > Q1: Do we intend to support multiple systems long-term, or do we > intend to settle on a single system, probably in jessie+1 ? > > Q2: Is it OK for packages to depend on a specific init system as > pid 1 ?
[...] > Firstly, as I have said, TC members should be able to express the > preference "only X, X by default but also others, Y by default but > also others, Y", which is a perfectly reasonable one but which cannot > be expressed by a concurrent ballots The only reason to interlink these questions is if the ordering of someone's preference on the init system question is dependent on their preference on these two questions. If that's the case, then whoever feels that way should propose a draft which includes an option which handles that particular case. > Secondly, making a decision on the default without clearly stating a > requirement for support for multiple systems risks a situation where > partisans for the winning system create "facts on the ground" which > make it difficult to support multiple systems. This presupposes bad faith, and even if it were so, such behavior would still be possible even if we voted in a single decision. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com The computer allows you to make mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila -- Mitch Ratcliffe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org