On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:13:33AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > We might disagree on the extent, perhaps, but I doubt anyone on the > committee would vote against this in its general form; both systemd and > upstart implement interfaces beyond the bare minimum, though upstart > certainly takes a more minimalist tack.
I just wonder why nobody from tect-ctte take care about the exact specification of that "bare minimum" (or, in other words, what exactly is wrong with sysvinit). Correct me, please, if I'm wrong. The whole 3000+ thread is about different features of one or another sysvinit replacement. Or do we buy the least terrible variant from the submitted? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
