On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 01:03:28PM +0100, Valéry Perrin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Ola Lundqvist a écrit :
> > In this case it is trivial. Just type make.
> 
> Yes, for your package this is very easy. But many translators dont work
> with the source package (they never download them). They take a .pot
> file in a web storage (like
> http://www.fr.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/pot ), translate
> the .pot file and send the po to maintener.
> Often, when a translator begin a work, he search the .pot file. If
> there's not .pot file, he translate  an other thing.  A translator is
> not a developper, he translate and that's all.
> I'm not a good example : I'm more a developper than a translator.

I see.

> > Isn't it better to search for .po files ?
> No, because maintener may prepare his package for l10n and have no
> translation. A package with a .po file has been translated at least one
> time, a package with .pot file is "for translation" with or without
> others translations.

Ok.

> > Or even search for packages that depend on po4a ?
> No. po4a is used for other uses, programs package messages translation,
> debconf translation, etc. It's not used only for manpages translation.

Hmm ok.

> > I do not really understand this. The pot file will be recreated so patching
> > that file do not help in this case.
> Yes. pot file is never patched. but when a translator begin translation
> he take the "xx.pot" file, just rename it "language.po", translate this
> .po file and send this to maintener (only po file). If two translators
> (or more) work (on differents languages) they need to do this with the
> same .pot (maintener's .pot file). If they create their own pot file
> with different options their translations will be not merged correctly.

I see.

> Worse, if the maintener's options are not the same to the translator's
> options, translation could be not correctly merged. (in the case of a
> complex .pot build, not with this package of course)
> 
> To conclude this discussion, it's true than, for this package, "to hold
> or not to hold" :-) the .pot file is not very critical because build the
> .pot file is trivial and there's not many translations.

Ok. I'll think about a good solution that work with the way I
make this package.

Regards,

// Ola



> Best regards
> 
> Valéry Perrin
> 



-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to