Excuse the ignorance if this suggestion winds up being not any different from Ian's current proposal, due to the specifics of the Condorcet method. But in case it is, it strikes me that coupling the "multiple" vote with the "init" vote allows for more voting options, and thus the potential for an unwanted outcome. Currently as I understand it, the ballot has these choices: D, DM, U, UM, O, OM, V, VM, FD. I would suggest factoring out the "M" choice into a separate vote on the same ballot. I would thus propose the following vote:
=== Begin misguided suggestion to the TC === Question A. Debian will use the following init system as the default init on Linux: D) systemd U) upstart O) openrc V) sysvinit FD) further discussion Question B. Debian will allow alternative, non-default, init systems on Linux: Y) yes N) no FD) further discussion Question C. The decision of a simple majority GR decision will become the TC's decision for questions A and B above. Y) yes N) no FD) further discussion === End misguided suggestion to the TC === Obviously the language of each question isn't as tight as it could be, but the general suggestion here is that by splitting question A from B, I believe we might mitigate some potential surprises... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
