Le Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 05:06:22PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > While I perfectly agree that it would have been the correct way to > discuss claiming parts of the namespace first (heck, even if you do > discuss changes for uscan at length like I did for Files-Excluded people > raise their hands afterwards that should be implemented differently) I > would volunteer to *help* (not lead) in a transition which means > > * reuploading files of Debian Med (and if needed of Debian Science > and DebiChem) > * working on the needed changes for UDD machine readable files gatherer > > However, my prefered solution for this problem would to start an open > discussion on debian-devel for opinions about a potential new name for > the signature file. This would have two advantages: > > 1. We might find some better consensus which could make a stressfull > transition superfluous > 2. Readers of the list would hopefully *learn* about both things > (the signature file as well as the metadata file)
Hello James, what is your take on this ? Will you start a discussion on debian-devel ? Have a nice Sunday, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org