On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:49:16 Robert Edmonds wrote: > Chris Knadle wrote: > > On Monday, February 03, 2014 22:25:23 Robert Edmonds wrote: > > > I've uploaded protobuf 2.5.0-8 to experimental, which has the exact same > > > ABI/API as protobuf 2.5.0-5. Can you tell me if the current version of > > > mumble in the archive works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8, once it's > > > available at your mirror? (I suspect that it will, but just want to > > > make sure.) > > > > Yes, the existing 1.2.4-0.1+b1 in Unstable works with libprotobuf8 > > 2.5.0-8. > > OK, I've uploaded -9 to unstable. libprotobuf8's .so is byte identical, > at least on amd64. Can you check that mumble still works? (I would be > surprised if it did not.)
Yep, mumble 1.2.4-0.1+b1 works fine with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-9. Thanks. There are other fixes for mumble pending requiring a new upload so I'm glad to have the protobuf transition done. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org