Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?"):
> In this case I suggest to decide just the question of the default init
> system on Linux architectures first and address further details later if
> no consensus can be found elsewhere. Finding the correct wording then
> should be easier.

I strongly object to this approach for the reasons I have given
already.

If I am given the opportunity to do so, if such a resolution is
proposed I will always propose amendments to settle the T vs L
question.

If I am not given the opportunity to do so, that would be because
someone proposes a set of options which do not answer the tying
question, and immediately calls for a vote.

Under the circumstances that would be IMO a clear breach of process.
I hope that now that I have made this perfectly clear, that this will
not happen.

Ian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to