Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> > Package: tex-common >> > Version: 0.10 >> > >> > tex-common seems to ask for verification on >> > file change. >> > I suppose it's meant to be fixed in 0.10, but it's apparently not. >> >> It seems as if you (or some script?) has changed the setting for >> dvipsDownloadBase14; this setting is also false in sarge and etch, but >> it doesn't show up in the diff. > > This has happened on more than one machine, and I don't remember > changing that configuration.
This is strange; unless I find out that the woody and sarge files differ only in that one line, I must suspect a script from some other package. >> > Inst tetex-extra [2.0.2c-9] (3.0-10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [] >> > Inst libkpathsea4 (3.0-10.1 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [] >> > Remv tetex-base [2.0.2c-9] [dvipsk-ja ptex-base dvipdfmx tetex-bin pgf ] >> > Inst tetex-bin [2.0.2-31] (3.0-10.1 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) >> > [dvipsk-ja ptex-base dvipdfmx pgf texinfo ] >> > Inst tetex-base [2.0.2c-9] (3.0-10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) [texinfo >> > ] >> > Inst tex-common (0.10 Debian AMD64 archive:unstable) >> >> I don't know where these lines are from, and how to interpret them. >> Does that mean that you just installed tetex-base before trying the >> upgrade? Where there conffiles of tetex-base on the system before that? >> > > It means, I installed tetex-bin, which pulled in tetex-base. > This is an output of single apt session. > > The versions in the square brackets are the version numbers > before install. The versions in round brackets are the > versions that are going to install. And what does "Inst" mean, then: unpacking for later configuration, or in fact "install", so that the postinst would be called at once? I assume the first, otherwise there'd be very strange things happening on your system. But that's probably not relevant for this bug. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
