On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:09:45PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > > "The output of the cal command is supposed to be bit for bit > > compatible to the original Unix cal command, because its output is > > processed by other programs like CGI scripts, that should not be > > broken." > > You got a point there. So does the original cal support '-h' or > highlighting at all?
The Debian cal is the first one that I've ever run into that supports either. The cal on OpenBSD 5.4, Mac OS X 10.9, and RHEL 6 (the systems I have handy) all don't. Highlighting is great. I argue merely that it should only highlight when the output's going to a terminal. - Aaron -- Aaron Hall : Where's the ka-boom? There was supposed to be an [email protected] : Earth-shattering ka-boom! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
