On Monday, February 10, 2014 04:44:10 PM Axel Beckert wrote: > According to "apt-file search ecrm1095" on Sid and Wheezy, it seems as > if ecrm1095 moved from texlive-latex-recommended to > texlive-latex-recommended: > > texlive-fonts-recommended: > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1095.mf > texlive-fonts-recommended: > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/jknappen/ec/ecrm1095.tfm > texlive-latex-recommended: > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1095.mf > texlive-latex-recommended: > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/jknappen/ec/ecrm1095.tfm > > I didn't yet spot the according changelog entry, but since there was > only one upload of texlive-base since the upload of 5.0.5-1, it must > have been this upload: > > texlive-base (2013.20140123-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * new upstream checkout > * t-pictures: changes wish -> tk (Closes: #732784) > * tighten build-dep on tex-common to >= 4 (Closes: #733414) > > -- Norbert Preining <prein...@debian.org> Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:12:37 +0900
See also #738402 (against autoconf) where Norbert Preining explained that the move was done upstream and the Debian packages just followed suit. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
