On 02/21/2014 02:21 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > since both packages bowtie (1.0!) and tophat stopped building from > source since we switched to seqan 1.4 (both bug reports in CC) and > upstream of both programs did not responded since > three weeks I wonder > whether we should reintroduce a seqan 1.3 package to be able to build > the packages again. As far as I understood both have some relevance in > several workflows and we should not leave these with release critical > bugs. those programs are indeed commonly used in bioinformatics and are really necessary. Keeping an older version of seqan would be a good idea.
Olivier > > Any opinions? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- Olivier Sallou IRISA / University of Rennes 1 Campus de Beaulieu, 35000 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org