On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 18:20 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote: > > Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable. > > The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using > > internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUable. > > Assuming that all we're expecting to be involved is the binNMUs, please > go ahead (i.e. there aren't a bunch of "FTBFS against eglibc 2.18" bugs > hiding up your sleeve somewhere :-).
The binNMUs are all scheduled and have mostly built now; we're just waiting for mipsel to chew through a few large packages which all seem to have got picked up at the same time. One problem is libnih's FTBFS on i386 - #739913. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org