Norbert Preining wrote: >>with this, you are just preventing the respective lines from being >>executed. I guess you have BUILDUSERNAME unset (default)? >> >>Maybe we should also "cat >>" to etc/shadow etc. if it doesn't exist? > > > Well, I didn't say that this is the right solution. But what is *TRUE* > is that the check for -n is *WRONG* in any case, so it is useless to > have this check! Why would there be a check for -n if the variable is > either "su " or "su username"? In any case it is -n! So there is for > sure a failure.
I guess dancer intended it for checking if the variable was set to anything (assuming that the default case is "" instead of "su "). I.e. in the default case without a special user, we wouldn't manipulate etc/shadow et al. So your solution was even right, but for the wrong problem... ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
