Hi Ben,

please look into the Bug report. There is a mail from tonight which
seemed to come from you:

> Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2014 23:53:04 +0000
> From b...@decadent.org.uk Sun Mar 23 23:53:04 2014
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>       (2011-06-06) on buxtehude.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
>       T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham
>       version=3.3.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 66; neutral, 19; spammy, 0.
>       spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*u:devscripts, 0.000-+--H*u:bts,
>       0.000-+--H*UA:bts, 0.000-+--H*UA:devscripts, 
> 0.000-+--H*F:D*decadent.org.uk
> Return-path: <b...@decadent.org.uk>
> Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126])
>       by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps 
> (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
>       (Exim 4.80)
>       (envelope-from <b...@decadent.org.uk>)
>       id 1WRsCC-0000M4-3I
>       for cont...@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:53:04 +0000
> Received: from [192.168.4.249] (helo=deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk)
>       by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps 
> (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
>       (Exim 4.80)
>       (envelope-from <b...@decadent.org.uk>)
>       id 1WRsC6-0004r8-Ah
>       for cont...@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:52:46 +0000
> Received: from ben by deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk with local (Exim 4.82)
>       (envelope-from <b...@decadent.org.uk>)
>       id 1WRsC5-0001ks-VY
>       for cont...@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:52:45 +0000
> From: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
> To: cont...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: severity of 685439 is important
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:52:45 +0000
> User-Agent: devscripts bts/2.14.1
> Message-ID: <1395618765-765-bts-...@decadent.org.uk>
> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.249
> X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: b...@decadent.org.uk
> X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded 
> to false
> Delivered-To: cont...@bugs.debian.org

Can you please verify this?

Christoph

Am 24.03.2014 13:23, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:22 +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> why did you set this bug report to grave?
> 
> I didn't.
> 
> Ben.
> 
>> Christoph
>>
>> Am 24.03.2014 00:57, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
>>> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>>>
>>>> severity 685439 important
>>> Bug #685439 [apt-show-versions] Use of uninitialized value in hash element
>>> Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
>>>> thanks
>>> Stopping processing here.
>>>
>>> Please contact me if you need assistance.
>>>
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to