[Steve Langasek] > In unstable, this has been moved to the 'startpar' package. It's also > apparently been renamed, without discussion with me, to > 'startpar-injector'...
Yeah, to make sure the startpar package do not have to conflict with sysvinit-utils. See <URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sysvinit-devel/2014-February/007399.html > for the email where I ask for feedback on the approach. > Petter, please revert this change of the startpar-bridge name. > Upstart systems absolutely *must not* have two versions of the > startpar bridge job installed on the system at the same time, this > will cause busy loops between the two! Hm, my plan is to remove the /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf during upgrades to a sysvinit-utils package depending on startpar (see the package in experimental). Will this not work? Something in particular I need to adjust to keep upstart working in the process? I believed it would be enough to depend on startpar and remove the /etc/init/startpar-bridge.conf file during upgrade. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
