Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > > severity 339255 normal > tags 339255 + wontfix > retitle 339255 "QuantLib has now been rebuilt with g++-4_4.0.2-4" > thanks > > On 18 November 2005 at 09:15, Matthias Klose wrote: > | reopen 339255 > | thanks > | > | Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > | > quantlib (0.3.11-2) unstable; urgency=low > | > . > | > * Rebuilt with new g++ for libstdc++ allocator transition (Closes: > #339255) > | > | The library package was not renamed. It's no reason, that you _can_ > | rebuild all other packages. > > But that is silly.
no, I tried to explain, that it is not. > Forcing a renaming is a make-work project for everybody. that's unfortunate, but not an argument. > By this evening, the two depedents of the package will have been > uploaded, and the mt_alloc will be _gone_ everywhere QuantLib has source in > Debian. So a closed bug as far as I am concerned, > > | Partial upgrades will be still broken. > > Maybe right in theory but wrong in practice as QuantLib was _already blocked > for 24 days by boost_ so there can't be a partial upgrade. Cannot happen. > > I really think I will close this once the two dependents are uploaded. I'm going to upload a NMU which renames the library package, if you think that it's too much work. You don't need to upload the dependent packages, ask for binNMU's instead on debian-release. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]