On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:00:39PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 25.03.2014 18:56, schrieb Michael Biebl: > > Am 20.03.2014 23:58, schrieb Bill Allombert: > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:39:17AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:39:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > >>>> So, I propse adding to the list of exceptions in policy section 9.1.1: > >>>> > >>>> The FHS requirement that architecture-independent application-specific > >>>> static files be located in /usr/share is relaxed to a suggestion. > >>>> > >>>> In particular, a subdirectory of /usr/lib may be used by a package > >>>> (or a collection of packages) to hold a mixture of > >>>> architecture-independent > >>>> and architecture-dependent files. However, when a directory is > >>>> entirely composed of architecture-independent files, it should be > >>>> located in /usr/share. > >>> > >>> Seconded. > >> > >> So I have created a branch 'bug741304-bill' with this change. > >> Please check the diff (in attachment). > > > I'm not a native speaker, but > > + The FHS requirement that architecture-independent > + application-specific static files be located in > > I'd probably change that to > "application-specific static files must be located" > to emphasize that a must directive was relaxed to should.
Neither I am, but none of the other exceptions use that language, so I kept the proposed wording. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
