On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:50:15PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > On 2014-04-10 17:40, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > > However, postrm cannot rely on anything in dependencies, there is no
> > > warranty on removal ordering. So, script is not available and not run if
> > > dictionaries-common is removed first (which can happen) and those dirs are
> > > left behind. This is something I am trying to fix in new -dev debhelper
> > > snippets allowing for explicit removal of those dirs if empty.
> >
> > can't you do this cleanup already from somedict.postrm remove (instead
> > of somedict.postrm purge)?
>
> It is already done at postrm removal stage. However, I now notice that when
> the removal script in first snippet is run, even if there is a single
> installed dict, /var/lib/{a,i}spell still has some contents that will be
> removed later by the second snippet, and thus the dir is not removed. I have
> to think about reversing debhelper snippets ordering.
Hi,
I uploaded new dictionaries-common-dev with some fixes for the last issues
found and a number of updated dictionaries using that version. They have
reached testing without further bug reports or piuparts complaints once the
time delay is passed, so I hope there are no more big problems with the
other aspects of the implementation (none of them use aspell-simple).
Also, Ubuntu seems to have unlocked the Debian->Ubuntu migration path and I
see no related bug reports there, additional good news.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hallo Agustin,
>
> Just an idea: Maybe a sample package would be helpful as a reference? (I
> can prepare one after my vacation)
Better if we have one, thanks. Please make sure to use at least
dictionaries-common-dev 1.23.2 to get the most recent snippets.
Regards,
--
Agustin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
