On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:48:34 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 18:34:35 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > As already said in the original bug report, please see the almost > > identical bug #740463 for some further details about the SCOTCH > > licensing issues. > > > > I hope this clarifies. > > > From what I understand CeCILL-C is intended to be more permissive than > plain CeCILL, which itself is explicitly GPL-compatible. So not really.
Regardless of what the license is *intended* to be, CeCILL-C in fact includes restrictions not present in the GNU GPL and has no explicit conversion-to-GPL clause, unlike the CeCILL license. As a consequence, CeCILL-C really appears to be GPL-incompatible, unfortunately... Anyway, thanks for following up on this bug report of mine. And thanks for any help you may provide to fix the issue! Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgptfj10uFcI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
