Package: xorriso
Version: 1.3.2-1
User: [email protected]
Usertags: adequate incompatible-licenses
The xorriso's copyright file says:
Files: *
License: GPL-2
But /usr/bin/xorriso is linked to libreadline6, which is GPLv3+. These
two licenses are not compatible.
But perhaps there's no license incompatibility, just a buggy copyright
file? I couldn't find any evidence in the upstream code that the license
is GPLv2-only. On the contrary, upstream COPYRIGHT file reads:
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 or later as
published by the Free Software Foundation.
So presumably debian/copyright should use this instead:
License: GPL-2+
<advert>
This bug was brought to you by adequate:
https://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/adequate
</advert>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages xorriso depends on:
ii libacl1 2.2.52-1
ii libburn4 1.3.2-1
ii libc6 2.18-7
ii libisoburn1 1.3.2-1
ii libisofs6 1.3.2-1
ii libjte1 1.19-2
ii libreadline6 6.3-6
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
