On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 08:17:14AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2014-05-30 Peter Pentchev <r...@ringlet.net> wrote: > [...] > > What do you think about the attached patches that, only for the case of > > building in the "stage1" profile designed for bootstrapping, disable the > > rebuild of the PDF documentation so that libtasn1-6 no longer > > build-depends on texlive-latex-base? > [...] > > Hello Peter, > > Sorry to bother you again. > > Instead of patch2 I would rather move texlive-latex-base/gtk-doc-tools > (and change the package to still build correctly, of course ;-).
I assume you meant "move... to Build-Depends-Indep" here :) > Assuming our bootstrapping process is not very stupid and defers or > does not build binary-all packages this should also make 749855 > superfluous. > > Any comments from your side? This is actually the best solution. Yes, the bootstrap builds only the arch-specific packages, it uses the ready-made arch:all packages from the archive, so everything should be fine and there need be no build-profile-specific changes to debian/control indeed. I'll come back to you with a patch in a couple of hours. Thanks! G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p.penc...@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 I am the meaning of this sentence.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature