Package: postfix-policyd-spf-python
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: normal

Dear Scott Kitterman,

Thanks for maintaining this package, I really like it and implemented it 
successfully.
However, I think I've found a minor glitch in the logcheck default filtering 
rule: The empty regex line (line2) is making the logcheck rule unusable (it is 
discarded by logcheck by default)

This concerns the file located at 
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/postfix-policyd-spf-python.logcheck
or from the src: 
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/pypolicyd-spf/trunk/debian/postfix-policyd-spf-python.logcheck?revision=8841&view=markup

An empty line technically matches all the content from all the logfiles and 
would therefore break the logcheck entirely (not sending anything), therefore 
logcheck discards the configuration file you've carefully crafted.

Removing the empty line worked for me.

Kind regards,
Jort Koopmans


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages postfix-policyd-spf-python depends on:
ii  adduser     3.113+nmu3
ii  postfix     2.9.6-2
ii  python      2.7.3-4+deb7u1
ii  python-spf  2.0.7-3
ii  python2.6   2.6.8-1.1
ii  python2.7   2.7.3-6+deb7u2

postfix-policyd-spf-python recommends no packages.

Versions of packages postfix-policyd-spf-python suggests:
ii  python-authres  0.402-1

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/postfix-policyd-spf-python.logcheck changed:
+^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ policyd-spf\[[0-9]+\]: 
(Pass|Neutral|None|Softfail|Fail|Temperror|Permerror); 
identity=(helo|mailfrom); client-ip=[0-9a-f.:]+; helo=.*; envelope-from=.*; 
receiver=


-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to