On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:24:00AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Chris M. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On 11/18/05, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The bug submitter in #231806 suggest that we at least document why > > > scripts in sources/scripts are *not* packaged in Debian packages.
> > > He mentions findsmb in the bug report, but this actually is similar > > > for all utilities in source/scripts such as smbtar. > > > I think it would be worth adding some words in README.Debian about > > > this. > > Out of interest, what *is* the reason for them being entirely missing, > > even from some samba-utils (or something) package? > Well, this is more or less the question That stepped in my mind. > The suggestion for a samba-utils seems worth to be considered at the > minimum. Let's wait for the advice of other contributors to the samba package No particular reason, AFAIK. If you decide to put together a samba-utils package, please make sure that everything you put in it is both useful, and functional on Debian. :) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature